March 23, 2009

Mr. H. Cabanne Howard
Committee on Judicial Responsibility and Disability
P. O. Box 8058
Portland, ME 04104

Dear Mr. Howard:

Please find enclosed a series of letters that were generated by my receipt of a copy of Peter DeTroy's letter to Ralph Dyer. My letter to Justice Saufley summarizes the core of my concern that I was not treated fairly by Justice Fritzsche. The allegations in the DeTroy letter have some credibility when measured against the ruling made by J. Fritzsche in the Post Conviction Review Hearing.

A conflict of interest between a defense lawyer and his defense lawyer in opposition to his client's interest should be given the same ruling by the Bar and the Courts as was given by the Bar over the job change of a secretary from one law firm to another. The fact that J. Fritzsche ignored the testimony of expert witness Mary Davis, Esq. and my previous lawyer Thomas Hallett, Esq. over the importance of Van Dyke's conflict can be emphasized by Hallett's testimony when he repeated three times that the knowledge of the conflict during Hallett's motions to vacate my second guilty plea, "Would have been huge". To read J. Fritzsche's words in the hearing transcript I refer you to my web site www.lyinglawyers.com. Please scroll to the heading dated, August 31, 2005.

Prior to receiving the DeTroy letter the Fritzsche ruling made no sense to any lawyer I discussed it with. Unfortunately, now it is clear what took place.

Please take whatever steps you deem appropriate with this information and send me a report of your actions.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Michael Doyle
3 Shady Lane
Falmouth, ME 04105
766.6644